Archbishop Hart

[ Back ]

Address to the Annual Conference of Right To Life, Victoria

Address Given By Archbishop Denis Hart
at Xavier College, Kew,
on Saturday, 26th June, 2004, at 11.30am

Address

My dear Friends,

It gives me great pleasure as Archbishop to be with you and to encourage you in the work for an even clearer recognition of the dignity of human life throughout our society. It has often been said that the womb is one of the most dangerous places in the world for life. Increasingly, in a society, which is guided not by moral and ethical perspectives, but by pragmatism, it can also be asserted that old age and frailty are an increasingly dangerous situation in our society at large.

The dialogue, which the Catholic Church and which we who respect and fight for the dignity of life need to conduct with the society, is to heighten the great reality of the dignity of the human person and of the imperative of respect for existing life from its first and weakest moment right to the end, at death.

On 20th March this year Pope John Paul II used his teaching authority to address participants in an International Congress on the Vegetative State. In so doing he issued the first clear and explicit papal statement on the obligation to provide food and water for patients in a persistent vegetative state.

The Pope’s Address is most helpful because of its clarity, its recognition of the complexity of diagnosis at all stages and its clarion call of making us aware of the dignity of each human person.

Specifically:-

  1. The Church encourages men and women of science to dedicate their study to the improvement of diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and possibilities for rehabilitation for those people who rely completely on those who care for them.

  2. Next follows a definition - The person in a vegetative state shows no evident sign of self-awareness or of the environment and seems unable to interact with others or to react to special stimuli. Often the term, ‘permanent vegetative state’ has been used for those whose vegetative state continues for over a year, but it must be remembered that this is not a subject of actual diagnosis, but more a judgement on what prognosis the person has for recovery. The longer the state goes on, the less is the prognosis for recovery.

    The Pope further highlights the complexity when he says that medical science up until now is still unable to predict with certainty who among patients in this condition will recover and who will not.

    Secondly, it is necessary to arrive at correct diagnosis. This usually requires prolonged careful observation, the Pope says.

    He notes the high number of diagnostic errors reported in the literature and also that not a few of the people with appropriate treatment and rehabilitative programmes have been able to emerge from the state while others remain prisoners of their condition for long stretches of time even without technological support.

  3. What is absolutely vital is to remember that each patient has a truly human quality. The Pope rejects the demeaning of their value and personal dignity and uses strong language when he says, “I feel the duty to reaffirm strongly that the intrinsic value and personal dignity of every human being do not change no matter what the concrete circumstances of his or her life. A man, even if seriously ill or disabled in the exercise of his highest functions, is and always will be a man and will never become a vegetable or an animal. Even in a vegetative state they retain their human dignity in all its fullness.”

    The Pope uses beautiful words, “the loving gaze of God the Father continues to fall upon them acknowledging them as his sons and daughters, especially in need of help.” He highlights the grave responsibilities therefore of doctors and health care personnel to be supported by professional ethics.

  4. The Pope states authoritatively that the sick person in a vegetative state, awaiting either recovery or a natural end, still has the right to basic health care (nutrition, hydration, cleanliness, warmth, etc.) and to prevention of complications relating to confinement. The patient also has the right to appropriate rehabilitative care and to be monitored for clinical signs of eventual recovery.

  5. The Pope also stresses, “I should like particularly to underline how the administration of water and food, even when provided by artificial means, always represents a natural means of preserving life, not a medical act. Its use should be considered, in principle, ordinary and proportionate and as such morally obligatory in so far as and until it is seen to have attained its proper finality, which in the present case consists in providing nourishment to the patient and alleviation of his suffering.”

  6. We have mentioned the diagnosis of the condition. Continuing medical diagnosis is also important. The Pope reminds us that death by starvation or dehydration is the only possible outcome as a result of withdrawal of nutrition and hydration and if it is done knowingly and willingly becomes euthanasia by omission. The Pope is concerned that often the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration is a source of considerable suffering for the sick person even if that person can only react at the level of the nervous system.

  7. Catholic moral teaching emphasises that such nutrition and hydration must be continued and the Pope’s authoritative statement stresses the means so that a deep respect for the human condition will be maintained while life lasts.

  8. There is another important point of diagnosis, namely that when the body is actually rejecting nutrition and hydration, and the process of death has actually begun. Then nutrition may be discontinued, but it is important by love and comfort to moisten the patient’s lips, to recognise the process of death and to surround the person with prayer, love and comfort. Indeed the principle regarding the administration of food and liquids endures as long as the actual process of death has not begun and as long as its administration is not burdensome for the patient. The key question, one commentator said, is simply whether this means of feeding effectively provides nourishment and preserves life. It must be noted that the obligation to provide assisted feeding lasts only as long as such feeding meets its goals of providing nourishment and alleviating suffering.

The Pope’s address shows a thorough familiarity with the latest scientific findings on the vegetative state, which were highlighted at the March Congress.

With typical compassion, the Pope stresses that we must not abandon the families of those in a vegetative state, but we need to give them every possible help. Respite care, financial support, the sympathetic cooperation of medical professionals and volunteers and he urged society to provide psychological and spiritual comfort.

The Pope emphasises the dignity of the person in this state, who remains a human being to be treated with respect, to be loved, nourished, cared for and supported, including those who cannot visibly respond to our care.

If we remember the intrinsic value and personal dignity of every human being do not change as long as they are alive and act accordingly, as the Pope suggests, then we will recognise the various stages, our diagnosis will be clear headed, and we will support the life which exists while being aware at the end when the actual process of death has begun.

 

+ Denis J. Hart,
Archbishop of Melbourne.

 

At every Mass we pray: ‘Protect us from all anxiety, as we wait in joyful hope for the coming of Our Saviour, Jesus Christ.’ In these tough times I want young people to see there is a purpose to life. The bad times do pass away. There is hope.

Jesus is the giver of hope. The Church says: ‘Look to Jesus. He has not abandoned us. He offers us a future.’